CO129-235 - Public Offices - 1887 — Page 34

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

B & S (26,859%) 609-87

Office or Individual,

Admiralty

Date.

1887

21 Dec

Last previous Paper.

No. 25611/

C DOMESTIC.

25611

RECO

REGE DEC 87,

(Subject.)

Extension of

the Praya Wall

32

Adheres to views expressed

in latter

45 Nov.

Unless Col fort.

are

prepared to pay

the whole

Expenses, Sees no advantage in the matter & accordingly dissents from proposal to appoint a Departmental

Committee

pur 21/12

(Minutes.)

M. Bramston

The Admiralty don't care if the Colony is put to the

greatest inconvenience so

long as they can keep their Naval Yard where it is & retain their frontage - which they would lose if the Praya is Extended along the harbour

Reply That Sir W. Holland quite understands that their Lordships decline to adhere to the removal of the Naval Yard to Kowloon, and that the Committee was proposed with the view of ascertaining whether the extension of the Praya

can not be effected without removing the Naval Yard : and as it is understood that the Admiralty

Edit History

2026-05-25 21:41:46 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
B & S (26,859%) 609-87 Office or Individual, Admiralty Date. 1887 21 Dec Last previous Paper. No. 25611/ C DOMESTIC. 25611 RECO REGE DEC 87, (Subject.) Extension of the Praya Wall 32 Adheres to views expressed in latter 45 Nov. Unless Col fort. are prepared to pay the whole Expenses, Sees no advantage in the matter & accordingly dissents from proposal to appoint a Departmental Committee pur 21/12 (Minutes.) M. Bramston The Admiralty don't care if the Colony is put to the greatest inconvenience so long as they can keep their Naval Yard where it is & retain their frontage - which they would lose if the Praya is Extended along the harbour Reply That Sir W. Holland quite understands that their Lordships decline to adhere to the removal of the Naval Yard to Kowloon, and that the Committee was proposed with the view of ascertaining whether the extension of the Praya can not be effected without removing the Naval Yard : and as it is understood that the Admiralty
Baseline (Original)
دو B & S (26,859%) 609-87 Office or Lydvidual, Admiralty Date. 1887 21 Dee Last previous Paper. مد Stong Kong No. 25611/ C DOMESTIC. 25611 RECO REGE DEC 87, (Subject.) Extension of the Praya Wall 32 Adheres to views expressed Crn in latter 45 Nov. Unless Col fort. are prepared to pay ents 24759 ? 2 z De 23.mo Next subsequent Paper. 283 the whole the Expenses, Sees no advantage in the matter & accordingly dessents from proposal to appoint a Departinental diseursing (Alinutes.) M. Bramstinn Cominter pur 21/12 The Adominally don't care if the Colony is furt to the long greatest inconvenience to long as they can keef thin have Yard where it is a retain thin the frontage - which they women lose if the Prayn is Extender along the harbour Reply That Sir It. Holland quite undustands that their L'or decline to adhere to the removal of the Naval Gard to Karborn, and that the four Committer was proposed with the view of ascertaining whether the extension the Brangan can not be Effected without removing the Naval Yard : and as it is understorm that the Admiralty oh!. 0.
2026-05-25 21:41:46 · Baseline
View content

دو

B & S (26,859%) 609-87

Office or Lydvidual,

Admiralty

Date.

1887

21 Dee

Last previous Paper.

مد

Stong Kong

No. 25611/

C DOMESTIC.

25611

RECO

REGE DEC 87,

(Subject.)

Extension of

the Praya Wall

32

Adheres to views expressed

Crn

in latter

45 Nov.

Unless Col fort.

are

prepared to pay

ents

24759

? 2 z De

23.mo

Next subsequent Paper.

283

the whole

the Expenses, Sees no advantage in the matter & accordingly dessents from proposal to appoint a Departinental

diseursing

(Alinutes.)

M. Bramstinn

Cominter

pur 21/12

The Adominally don't care if the Colony is furt to the

long

greatest inconvenience to

long as they can keef thin have Yard where it is a retain thin the frontage - which they women lose if the Prayn is Extender along the harbour

Reply That Sir It. Holland quite undustands that their L'or decline to adhere to the removal of the Naval Gard to Karborn, and that the four Committer was proposed with the view of ascertaining whether the extension the Brangan

can not be Effected without removing the Naval Yard : and as it is understorm that the Admiralty oh!. 0.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.